LENS 02 / E

Energy

A smarter system still needs a socket. Who gets the power—and who pays when demand grows?

Headline figure · read its scope945TWh by 2030

IEA projection for global data-centre electricity demand. This includes more than AI, and is a forecast rather than a measurement.

IEA, Energy and AI, 2025 ↗

The current bill.

Read the evidence on both sides. Consider who benefits, who bears the cost, and what would change your judgement.

Follow the evidence ↓
01 / THE CONTEXT

Look beyond
the headline.

Data centres used about 415 TWh in 2024. The IEA projects demand more than doubling by 2030. Efficiency and new generation matter, but so do the timing of demand and local grid capacity.

  • 01Keep electricity demand separate from carbon emissions.
  • 02Distinguish annual energy matching from hourly supply.
  • 03Look at grid capacity and impacts on local ratepayers.
02 / THE EVIDENCE

What the figure
can tell us.

IEA projection for global data-centre electricity demand. This includes more than AI, and is a forecast rather than a measurement.

Read IEA, Energy and AI, 2025 ↗

Demand is growing. The future is a projection.

415 → 945TWh / year

Global data-centre electricity demand: 415 TWh in 2024, projected to reach about 945 TWh in 2030. This includes data centres serving uses beyond AI.

IEA · Energy and AI (2025) ↗

Read the source for its methods and limits. A published estimate, observed result and future projection answer different questions. The research figures describe this topic; they are not learner scores.

03 / TWO SIDES OF THE SAME SYSTEM

A benefit.
A consequence.

What it can give

Flexible computing workloads can shift to times with more available clean power. Better chips and cooling can deliver more useful work for each unit of electricity.

What it can cost

New load competes with other uses of the grid. Contracts for future renewable generation do not by themselves establish the hourly electricity mix of a facility operating today.

The judgement depends on context. Which effects matter most, who experiences them, and what evidence would change the decision?

PAUSE & REFLECT

Where do
you stand?

A data centre promises to match its annual electricity use with renewable purchases. What additional information would help you evaluate its impact on the local grid?

Consider the evidence, the people affected and what could change your judgement.

Preview example feedbackILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE · NO LIVE SCORING

Make the trade-off explicit. A reasoned reflection connects a possible benefit with a local cost, identifies who bears it, and asks what evidence could change the judgement.

This fixed example does not evaluate your draft or create a score.

Demo site